Home/Ballot measures/Proposition 45
PROP45
California · November 3, 2026 · upcoming

MODIFIES ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FOR CERTAIN PROJECTS.

Amends California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to expedite environmental review for certain projects (including most housing, transportation, water, and health projects) by setting deadlines to complete environmental review and resolve lawsuits challenging project approvals.

What your vote means

Yes or No, in the state's words

YES

Certain public and private projects would be eligible for new project review and court challenge procedures. For example, new procedures would tighten time limits for environmental review and reduce the scope of what courts can consider when reviewing legal challenges.

NO

Public and private projects would continue to use existing project review and court challenge procedures.

OFFICIAL FISCAL EFFECT

What the state says it may cost or change

Initial costs for state and local governments, likely in the high tens of millions of dollars—potentially exceeding $100 million—annually, partly covered by fees. Uncertain, potentially more significant positive or negative longer-term fiscal effects.

CURRENT LAW

Read the full analysis

The Quick Reference Guide does not publish a separate current-law sentence for this proposition. Election.org does not infer one. The Legislative Analyst's analysis in the official proposition PDF explains the baseline law.

Open official analysis ↗
WHY IT IS ON THE BALLOT

Qualified through petition signatures

The official guide labels this measure as put on the ballot by Petition Signatures. This is a source classification, not an Election.org judgment.

RESULT

Not available before Election Day

This election is upcoming. Election.org will not show a blank or zero as a result.

Attributed positions

Who the official quick guide lists

SUPPORTERS

California Children’s Hospital Association; California Water Association; California Council for Affordable Housing

OPPONENTS

Coalition for Clean Air; CA Environmental Voters; Physicians for Social Responsibility, LA; National Wildlife Federation

Arguments are the opinions of their authors and have not been checked for accuracy by an official agency.