Home/Federal committees/BLUMENTHAL FOR CONNECTICUT
2025–2026 federal committee · official FEC data

BLUMENTHAL FOR CONNECTICUT

Receipts, contributions, spending, cash, committee classification, and connected records from Federal Election Commission filings.

Principal campaign committeeDEMFEC C00492991
Direct answer · 2025–2026 cycle

How much money has BLUMENTHAL FOR CONNECTICUT reported?

$612,252.45 in total receipts and $373,460.79 in total disbursements.

These are committee filing totals. They do not establish who benefited from every dollar; candidate support and opposition require transaction-level independent-expenditure records.

Source: Federal Election Commission · data through .

Total receipts$612,252
Total spending$373,461
Independent expendituresNot reported
Campaign money

Committee finance details

FEC COMMITTEE SUMMARY
2025–2026 federal-cycle totals through June 30, 2026.
MetricReported amountWhat it means
Total receipts$612,252.45All receipts reported by the committee for the cycle.
Individual contributions$272,627.19Contributions reported in the FEC individual-contribution category.
Other committee contributions$103,500.00Contributions received from other political committees.
Total disbursements$373,460.79All disbursements reported by the committee for the cycle.
Contributions to other committeesNot reportedContributions the committee reported making to federal candidate committees.
Independent expendituresNot reportedSpending expressly advocating the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate, made without coordination.
Cash on hand$1,476,933.19Cash reported at the end of the covered filing period.
Debts owed by committee$0.00Outstanding debts the committee reported owing.

“Not reported” means the current committee-summary file has no value for that field; it does not mean zero. Independent expenditures are distinct from contributions made directly to candidate committees.

Money graph · dates, geography, and operating expenditures

How money moved through BLUMENTHAL FOR CONNECTICUT

FEC ITEMIZED FILES

These panels show privacy-thresholded itemized individual-receipt activity and amendment-normalized operating expenditures. They are descriptive slices of filings—not a complete substitute for the official financial summary.

Itemized individual receipt activity over time

Monthly transaction activity from the FEC individual-contributions file. Current-cycle files can contain earlier-dated transactions; signed amendments, refunds, reattributions, and memo entries remain in the source-defined analysis.

18 months

Where itemized contributor addresses were reported

State is taken from the contributor address on the FEC row. It does not prove residence, citizenship, employer location, or the ultimate economic source of funds.

76.2% outside Connecticut
District of Columbia19 distinct reported contributors · 30 rows$42,000.0024.1%
Connecticut120 distinct reported contributors · 689 rows$41,605.0023.8%
Virginia13 distinct reported contributors · 19 rows$30,750.0017.6%
Maryland13 distinct reported contributors · 24 rows$26,150.0015.0%
Massachusetts7 distinct reported contributors · 23 rows$14,790.008.5%
Florida6 distinct reported contributors · 29 rows$9,115.005.2%
California7 distinct reported contributors · 30 rows$8,420.004.8%
New York7 distinct reported contributors · 67 rows$1,781.001.0%

Only committee/state groups with at least 5 distinct reported contributors are published. The percentages use only the displayed dataset’s publishable, state-coded itemized rows; they are not a percentage of all campaign receipts.

Reported operating-expenditure categories

FEC filer-selected categories from Schedule B operating expenditures. Memo-code X rows are excluded because the FEC says they are not included in the itemization total.

1 published categories
Category not reported321 current organization-payment rows$300,729.27

Top organization payees in operating expenditures

Organization payees only. Election.org excludes individual payees and conservatively normalizes names; similar names are not asserted to be one legal entity.

Browse vendor graph →
Ngp Van Incorporated12 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-30
$90,393.69
Anne Lewis Strategies Dba Mission Wired8 current itemized payments · latest 2026-04-09
$63,264.60
Mlt Strategic Fundraising LLC19 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-30
$45,600.00
Adp LLC96 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-30
$29,726.27
United States Treasury2 current itemized payments · latest 2026-04-15
$17,214.00
Webster Bank20 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-24
$14,226.46
Capitol Compliance Associates Incorporated19 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-30
$13,789.80
Actblue Technical Services84 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-30
$9,899.49
Citizens Bank18 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-16
$6,040.42
Elias Law Group4 current itemized payments · latest 2026-04-15
$3,964.45
Verizon Wireless17 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-26
$2,879.49
Cacace Tusch And Santagata18 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-30
$2,700.00
Democracy Engine LLC4 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-11
$1,030.60

Source: FEC operating expenditures bulk file, checked 2026-08-24. These totals cover published current organization-payment rows after amendment normalization and are not equivalent to the committee’s total disbursements.

Official registration

Committee details

2026 CYCLE
Committee type
Senate campaign committee · code S
Designation
Principal campaign committee · code P
Filing frequency
Quarterly filer
Party affiliation
DEM
Connected organization
Not listed
Organization type
Not listed
Treasurer
ZAMORE, JUDITH
Mailing address
1111 SUMMER ST, STE 302, C/O CACACE TUSCH & SANTAGATA, STAMFORD CT 06905
FEC committee ID
C00492991
How to read this page

Registration type, direct contributions, and outside spending are different.

A committee can contribute directly to candidates, make independent expenditures, transfer money, or do some combination permitted by its registration. Election.org keeps those categories separate and does not infer support, opposition, coordination, or control from a name alone.