Home/Federal committees/DOUG CHAPIN FOR CONGRESS
2025–2026 federal committee · official FEC data

DOUG CHAPIN FOR CONGRESS

Receipts, contributions, spending, cash, committee classification, and connected records from Federal Election Commission filings.

Principal campaign committeeDFLFEC C00909531
Direct answer · 2025–2026 cycle

How much money has DOUG CHAPIN FOR CONGRESS reported?

$438,699.80 in total receipts and $368,407.29 in total disbursements.

These are committee filing totals. They do not establish who benefited from every dollar; candidate support and opposition require transaction-level independent-expenditure records.

Source: Federal Election Commission · data through .

Total receipts$438,700
Total spending$368,407
Independent expendituresNot reported
Campaign money

Committee finance details

FEC COMMITTEE SUMMARY
2025–2026 federal-cycle totals through July 22, 2026.
MetricReported amountWhat it means
Total receipts$438,699.80All receipts reported by the committee for the cycle.
Individual contributions$357,047.95Contributions reported in the FEC individual-contribution category.
Other committee contributions$8,234.07Contributions received from other political committees.
Total disbursements$368,407.29All disbursements reported by the committee for the cycle.
Contributions to other committeesNot reportedContributions the committee reported making to federal candidate committees.
Independent expendituresNot reportedSpending expressly advocating the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate, made without coordination.
Cash on hand$70,292.51Cash reported at the end of the covered filing period.
Debts owed by committee$50,000.00Outstanding debts the committee reported owing.

“Not reported” means the current committee-summary file has no value for that field; it does not mean zero. Independent expenditures are distinct from contributions made directly to candidate committees.

Money graph · dates, geography, and operating expenditures

How money moved through DOUG CHAPIN FOR CONGRESS

FEC ITEMIZED FILES

These panels show privacy-thresholded itemized individual-receipt activity and amendment-normalized operating expenditures. They are descriptive slices of filings—not a complete substitute for the official financial summary.

Itemized individual receipt activity over time

Monthly transaction activity from the FEC individual-contributions file. Current-cycle files can contain earlier-dated transactions; signed amendments, refunds, reattributions, and memo entries remain in the source-defined analysis.

13 months

Where itemized contributor addresses were reported

State is taken from the contributor address on the FEC row. It does not prove residence, citizenship, employer location, or the ultimate economic source of funds.

10.8% outside Minnesota
Minnesota316 distinct reported contributors · 580 rows$151,527.0089.2%
Virginia13 distinct reported contributors · 27 rows$11,702.006.9%
California7 distinct reported contributors · 7 rows$3,850.002.3%
District of Columbia6 distinct reported contributors · 9 rows$2,800.001.6%

Only committee/state groups with at least 5 distinct reported contributors are published. The percentages use only the displayed dataset’s publishable, state-coded itemized rows; they are not a percentage of all campaign receipts.

Reported operating-expenditure categories

FEC filer-selected categories from Schedule B operating expenditures. Memo-code X rows are excluded because the FEC says they are not included in the itemization total.

1 published categories
Category not reported260 current organization-payment rows$280,170.33

Top organization payees in operating expenditures

Organization payees only. Election.org excludes individual payees and conservatively normalizes names; similar names are not asserted to be one legal entity.

Browse vendor graph →
Jmb Media Group8 current itemized payments · latest 2026-07-01
$42,001.68
Gusto14 current itemized payments · latest 2026-07-15
$33,644.68
Sweater Vest Strategies5 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-01
$27,600.00
Impact Printing12 current itemized payments · latest 2026-07-01
$19,663.37
Ngpvan16 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-05
$19,218.26
Bumperactive5 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-24
$15,510.18
Grassroots Analytics8 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-05
$15,493.61
Minnesota Democratic Farmer Labor Party5 current itemized payments · latest 2026-05-11
$12,820.00
Actblue59 current itemized payments · latest 2026-07-22
$10,939.55
New Brighton Ford3 current itemized payments · latest 2026-04-24
$9,598.64
Tapper S Incorporated1 current itemized payment · latest 2026-06-02
$9,266.67
Dahlen Sign Company1 current itemized payment · latest 2025-12-19
$8,128.13
Cksc3 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-02
$7,000.00
Corporate Advertising And Incentives2 current itemized payments · latest 2026-05-22
$6,915.56
Genereux Fine Wood Products2 current itemized payments · latest 2026-07-01
$4,000.00

Source: FEC operating expenditures bulk file, checked 2026-08-24. These totals cover published current organization-payment rows after amendment normalization and are not equivalent to the committee’s total disbursements.

Official registration

Committee details

2026 CYCLE
Committee type
House campaign committee · code H
Designation
Principal campaign committee · code P
Filing frequency
Quarterly filer
Party affiliation
DFL
Connected organization
NONE
Organization type
Not listed
Treasurer
O'BERRY, BETSY
Mailing address
PO BOX 103, HANOVER MN 55341
FEC committee ID
C00909531
Connected records

Candidate records linked in FEC data

A candidate link comes from the committee or candidate master record. For a leadership PAC, association with a candidate does not make the committee an authorized candidate committee.

How to read this page

Registration type, direct contributions, and outside spending are different.

A committee can contribute directly to candidates, make independent expenditures, transfer money, or do some combination permitted by its registration. Election.org keeps those categories separate and does not infer support, opposition, coordination, or control from a name alone.