Home/Federal committees/RAVEN FOR CONGRESS CAMPAIGN
2025–2026 federal committee · official FEC data

RAVEN FOR CONGRESS CAMPAIGN

Receipts, contributions, spending, cash, committee classification, and connected records from Federal Election Commission filings.

Principal campaign committeeREPFEC C00896787
Direct answer · 2025–2026 cycle

How much money has RAVEN FOR CONGRESS CAMPAIGN reported?

$797,235.43 in total receipts and $722,075.73 in total disbursements.

These are committee filing totals. They do not establish who benefited from every dollar; candidate support and opposition require transaction-level independent-expenditure records.

Source: Federal Election Commission · data through .

Total receipts$797,235
Total spending$722,076
Independent expendituresNot reported
Campaign money

Committee finance details

FEC COMMITTEE SUMMARY
2025–2026 federal-cycle totals through July 29, 2026.
MetricReported amountWhat it means
Total receipts$797,235.43All receipts reported by the committee for the cycle.
Individual contributions$247,542.58Contributions reported in the FEC individual-contribution category.
Other committee contributions$0.00Contributions received from other political committees.
Total disbursements$722,075.73All disbursements reported by the committee for the cycle.
Contributions to other committeesNot reportedContributions the committee reported making to federal candidate committees.
Independent expendituresNot reportedSpending expressly advocating the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate, made without coordination.
Cash on hand$75,159.70Cash reported at the end of the covered filing period.
Debts owed by committee$293,897.05Outstanding debts the committee reported owing.

“Not reported” means the current committee-summary file has no value for that field; it does not mean zero. Independent expenditures are distinct from contributions made directly to candidate committees.

Money graph · dates, geography, and operating expenditures

How money moved through RAVEN FOR CONGRESS CAMPAIGN

FEC ITEMIZED FILES

These panels show privacy-thresholded itemized individual-receipt activity and amendment-normalized operating expenditures. They are descriptive slices of filings—not a complete substitute for the official financial summary.

Itemized individual receipt activity over time

Monthly transaction activity from the FEC individual-contributions file. Current-cycle files can contain earlier-dated transactions; signed amendments, refunds, reattributions, and memo entries remain in the source-defined analysis.

7 months

Where itemized contributor addresses were reported

State is taken from the contributor address on the FEC row. It does not prove residence, citizenship, employer location, or the ultimate economic source of funds.

65.0% outside Florida
Florida34 distinct reported contributors · 53 rows$13,497.0035.0%
California10 distinct reported contributors · 17 rows$8,870.0023.0%
Texas14 distinct reported contributors · 34 rows$7,396.0019.2%
North Carolina5 distinct reported contributors · 8 rows$3,550.009.2%
Pennsylvania7 distinct reported contributors · 14 rows$3,162.008.2%
Massachusetts5 distinct reported contributors · 11 rows$2,110.005.5%

Only committee/state groups with at least 5 distinct reported contributors are published. The percentages use only the displayed dataset’s publishable, state-coded itemized rows; they are not a percentage of all campaign receipts.

Reported operating-expenditure categories

FEC filer-selected categories from Schedule B operating expenditures. Memo-code X rows are excluded because the FEC says they are not included in the itemization total.

2 published categories
Category not reported161 current organization-payment rows$328,949.06
Administrative/Salary/Overhead Expenses1 current organization-payment row$730.00

Top organization payees in operating expenditures

Organization payees only. Election.org excludes individual payees and conservatively normalizes names; similar names are not asserted to be one legal entity.

Browse vendor graph →
Campaign Funding Direct Incorporated11 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-30
$71,214.34
Steve Kush Consulting LLC19 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-18
$69,309.65
Campaign Engine15 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-05
$37,690.32
Cp Direct LLC2 current itemized payments · latest 2026-04-20
$19,829.35
Bs Media LLC8 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-16
$17,416.96
Better Mousetrap Digital3 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-30
$16,550.90
Red Fox Strategies18 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-30
$12,253.95
Florida Division Of Elections1 current itemized payment · latest 2026-06-12
$10,400.00
Omega List Company4 current itemized payments · latest 2026-05-11
$10,126.72
Tma Direct3 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-30
$7,887.06
Valtim2 current itemized payments · latest 2025-12-01
$7,376.27
PAC Management Services LLC13 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-03
$7,350.00
Direct Mail Processors Incorporated6 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-08
$6,588.59
Emerald Sky Group14 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-16
$6,305.00
Mdi Imaging2 current itemized payments · latest 2026-06-29
$5,800.00

Source: FEC operating expenditures bulk file, checked 2026-08-24. These totals cover published current organization-payment rows after amendment normalization and are not equivalent to the committee’s total disbursements.

Official registration

Committee details

2026 CYCLE
Committee type
House campaign committee · code H
Designation
Principal campaign committee · code P
Filing frequency
Quarterly filer
Party affiliation
REP
Connected organization
Not listed
Organization type
Not listed
Treasurer
CURTIS, ELIZABETH
Mailing address
433 PLAZA REAL SUITE 275, BOCA RATON FL 33432
FEC committee ID
C00896787
How to read this page

Registration type, direct contributions, and outside spending are different.

A committee can contribute directly to candidates, make independent expenditures, transfer money, or do some combination permitted by its registration. Election.org keeps those categories separate and does not infer support, opposition, coordination, or control from a name alone.